+44 (0) 207 8227325
Eesvan was called to the bar in 2013, after practising as a barrister in New Zealand and completing a doctorate in law at the University of Oxford. He has a wide-ranging practice that includes public law and regulatory disputes, human rights, financial services, and competition law.
In 2017, Eesvan was appointed to the Panel of Counsel for the Serious Fraud Office.
Eesvan has acted in and advised on public law and regulatory matters as diverse as the use of post-offer undertakings under the Takeover Code, the withdrawal of green energy subsidies, the Dubs amendment, the setting of the personal injury discount rate, and (in one of The Lawyer's Top 20 Cases of 2017 and 2018, SFO v ENRC) questions of legal professional privilege in the context of a corporate self-report to the Serious Fraud Office.
Advising the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers on various questions arising from the giving of post-offer undertakings under the Takeover Code (with Michael Fordham QC).
Acting for a refugee charity challenging the consultation process by which the SSHD fixed the number of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children to be relocated from Calais to the UK (with Nathalie Lieven QC and Laura Dubinsky)
Acting for the Serious Fraud Office in a claim for declaratory relief concerning legal professional privilege in the context of a corporate-self report (with Jonathan Fisher QC and James Segan).
Junior counsel to an investigation into institutional responses to internet-facilitated child sexual abuse. The investigation extends to matters such as the regulation of the internet industry and the effectiveness of the National Crime Agency and police forces at detecting and responding to such abuse.
Acted for the Lord Chancellor in resisting permission to judicially review the process of setting the personal injury discount rate under the Damages Act 1996 (with Timothy Otty QC).
Acted for the claimants in a judicial review of the removal of the exemption for renewable source electricity from the Climate Change Levy (with Michael Fordham QC and Jason Pobjoy).
Advised on a matter relating to the disciplinary rules for the bar (with Michael Beloff QC).
Acted for the Defendant in a costs application arising from judicial review proceedings.
Eesvan has a long-standing interest in civil liberties and human rights, having lectured, volunteered, and researched in the field.
Prior to joining Chambers, Eesvan assisted counsel for the detainee in Zaoui v Attorney General  1 NZLR 666;  1 NZLR 289 (SC), New Zealand’s first case of detention on the grounds of national security.
Eesvan co-founded student pro bono programmes at the two universities in which he studied. In 2005, he co-founded The Equal Justice Project, the first such programme at the University of Auckland. In 2009, he co-founded Oxford Legal Assistance, the first undergraduate pro bono law clinic at the University of Oxford.
Advised a trans man resident in Hong Kong on challenging the failure by Her Majesty's Passport Office to amend the gender marker on his British National (Overseas) Passports from female to male (with Timothy Otty QC).
Acted for the Claimant in a challenge under art 6 ECHR and art 47 of the Charter of Rights to an assertion of immunity by the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development against a claim for race and disability discrimination.
Advised the Metropolitan Police on legal questions arising from an investigation into phone hacking (with Michael Beloff QC).
Eesvan has a keen interest in financial services law and has acted in a number of financial services disputes, including (led by Andrew George QC) one of the first proceedings for compensation under s.90 FSMA (compensation for statements in listing particulars of prospectus). He has also advised on a wide range of financial services matters, such as the approved persons regime, the scope of the Conduct of Business sourcebook, responsibilities in relation to appointed representatives, pensions regulations, and the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Eesvan also advised the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority on an investigation into the conduct of an insurance intermediary.
In 2014-2015, Eesvan was seconded to the Financial Conduct Authority for five months, where he worked in the General Counsel’s Division. Eesvan’s primary responsibility was to draft an FCA rules instrument amending the FCA Handbook to implement part of the Mortgage Credit Directive 2014/17/EU. Eesvan also advised on a variety of other matters such as the supervision of firms and the scope of the FCA’s regulatory responsibilities.
Acted for a Defendant in a claim under s.90 FSMA (with Andrew George QC).
Advised on a proposed claim in negligence and for breach of the FCA Conduct of Business Sourcebook for losses incurred in commodities trading.
Advised on the merits of a proposed claim under the FCA Conduct of Business Sourcebook and at common law in relation to anticipated losses under a collective investment scheme, as well as the scope of the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Advised on compliance obligations under the FCA approved persons regime arising from the purchase of an insurance broking business.
Advised the FCA on consequential changes to the FCA Handbook arising from the implementation of the Mortgage Credit Directive 2014/17/EU.
Assisted Andrew Hunter QC and Andrew George in a Commercial Court trial of a claim of breach of contract and a counterclaim of misrepresentation arising from the failure of a currency trading system.
Advised the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority with an investigation into the conduct of an insurance intermediary.
Eesvan acts for the claimants in a substantial follow-on damages claim in the Chancery Division arising from the setting of interchange fees by MasterCard (with Kieron Beal QC and Tristan Jones). The substantive claim is ongoing but there have been judgments on various issues to date in the Chancery Division ( EWHC 3749 (Ch)), the Competition Appeal Tribunal ( CAT 14;  Bus LR 63], and the Court of Appeal ( EWCA Civ 272).
Eesvan has also conducted training in EU competition law.
Having studied and taught economics, Eesvan has a good working knowledge of the economics of competition law.
Eesvan has acted in a wide range of commercial matters, including contractual disputes in the county courts and High Court litigation (both led and un-led), with a particular emphasis on legal disputes relating to emerging technologies. Eesvan also has a developing practice in insolvency law.
Prior to joining Chambers, Eesvan practised as a barrister at Shortland Chambers, New Zealand, appearing in and assisting other counsel with a broad range of contractual, employment, agency, planning disputes before the New Zealand High Court, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court.
Acted for the respondent to an application in the Bankruptcy and Companies Court to set aside a statutory demand.
Acted for the Claimant in a High Court claim for the enforcement of intellectual property relating to ‘smart’ water meters (with Michael Bloch QC).
Acting for the Claimant in a High Court claim for breach of the Conduct of Business Sourcebook in relation to losses incurred from the failure of a collective investment scheme (with Tony Peto QC).
Acted for the Claimant in an application for summary judgment in the High Court against two foreign companies for breach of guarantees.
Acted for an employer in a High Court claim against a former employee for overpaid commission and misuse of a credit card.
Acted for the claimant in an application for winding-up for the failure to repay a debt arising from an investment agreement.
Acted for the Claimant in an application for summary judgment in a claim for breach of contract in the County Court.
Acted for the Claimant in a claim arising from the theft of bitcoins from a bitcoin exchange.
Advised Camelot on the merits of a claim to a prize in the National Lottery.
Eesvan has advised on a wide variety of environmental law matters, in particular various questions relating to the Air Quality Directive 2008/50/EC.
Advised a NGO on its consultation response to the Government’s plans to bring the UK into compliance with the Air Quality Directive.
Advised an NGO on the Air Quality Directive for the purpose of its consultation response to a proposal to widen a major motorway.
Advised an NGO on possible grounds on which to challenge the Government’s proposal to scrap the ‘Zero Carbon Homes’ policy.
LLB and BCom (First Class Honours) (Auckland); BCL (Dist.) and DPhil in Law (Oxon)
VAT registration number: 194286081
+44 (0) 207 8227325
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 8227327
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 8227326
+44 (0) 207 8227331
+44 (0) 207 8227323
+44 (0) 207 8227339
+44 (0) 207 8227330
+44 (0) 207 8227329
+44 (0) 207 8227338
+44 (0) 207 8227324